Ian & Stuart's Australian Mac: Not for Sale/Another.not.for.sale (Australia).iso/Dr. Doyle/Spirit/Science & Technology/Free Energy.faq

Text File | 1994-10-08 | 31KB | 690 lines

   Light-Technology: Free Energy, Theory, Devices and Progess/ Review of
   Free Energy Experiments

                       REVIEW OF FREE ENERGY EXPERIMENTS

   Contents:


   Abstract
   Definitions
   Sources of Information and Data
   Summary of Interesting Theories, Experiments, and Devices
   Possible Misleading Results
   Devices of Great Interest
   Summary Information and Data
   Conclusions
   Acknowledgments
   Footnotes



   A Critical Review of the Available Information Regarding Claims of
   Zero-Point Energy, Free-Energy, and Over-Unity Experiments and Devices




   Patrick G. Bailey P.O. Box 201 Los Altos, CA 94023-0201

   Toby Grotz 760 Prairie Avenue Craig, CO 81625-1346





Abstract



   A summary review is presented of the experiments, motors, generators,
   devices, and demonstrations that have been reported in the past few
   years to produce near-unity or over-unity operation. The concepts of
   free-energy, zero-point energy, and over-unity devices are not new,
   and many examples of such devices have been built within the last 100
   years. 26 researchers are reviewed and 11 are selected for immediate
   interest and support. Whether a new form of potential energy can be
   demonstrated and successfully utilized within the near future for the
   ultimate benefit of the human race remains to be seen.





Definitions



   'Energy' cannot be created nor destroyed - it exists throughout space
   and within matter. 'Perpetual Motion' does not exist - long lasting
   motion is easily observable, such as planetary orbits. 'Stupidity' is
   not hereditary - and it is not a survival trait.

   'Zero-Point Energy' (ZPE) is known as an energy that fills the fabric
   of all space. Technically the ZPE results from an electric flux that
   flows orthogonally to our perceived dimension or reality. The mass
   equivalence of this energy has been calculated by physicists to be on
   the order of 1093 gms/cm3. Henry T. Moray, Walter Russell, and Nikola
   Tesla described the nature of the ZPE and designed and built equipment
   to engineer its properties. It may be possible to build devices to
   cohere this energy. This would result in a non-polluting, unlimited
   supply of virtually free energy.

   'Free Energy' is a term that can have two meanings: either the
   additional energy that can be obtained from a device at little or no
   additional cost, so the additional energy is essentially free; or more
   output energy that appears to be available than input energy, such as
   in the case of detonating an atomic bomb.

   'Over-unity Devices' are those systems which appear to produce more
   energy than they use. In analyzing such systems, a box is drawn around
   the device and energy balances are formulated to measure the amounts
   of energy coming into and out of that box. Whether or not the device
   is termed an 'over-unity' device will depend upon the size of the box.
   When the box is drawn large enough, all systems or devices will have a
   net energy transfer of zero. On the other hand, when the box is drawn
   just small enough, the device can be said to be an 'over-unity'
   device, and an intelligent physicist will know better.

   From this point of view, examples of existing so-called free-energy
   devices abound: such as Hoover Dam. So then is any generator, or any
   nuclear reactor. More energy certainly comes out of a dam than went in
   to making it (by us, at least). And any dam engineer will tell you
   that it will produce more energy than it cost to build and that it
   will last forever (or at least until his kids get out of college). So
   it is seen that these generators can be thought of as free-energy
   devices, while they are really only energy conversion devices, and
   obviously not perpetual motion machines. People who insist that they
   actually are, are either very ignorant or very devious. In such cases,
   examine the person's true motives. [Another 'free-energy' device of
   increasingly note-worthy attention is the Federal Reserve, which is
   not an agency of the US government. (Figgie 1992)]





Sources of Information and Data



   Ultimately, the sources for all information in these areas come from
   the inventors, researchers, or investigators themselves. The US and
   foreign patent offices provide some information into new developments
   in these areas, yet the actual patents reveal very little useful
   information and almost no experimental results. Patent law does not
   require complete disclosure of all data, and patents are held
   nationally. An interesting area of big business today is the
   international transfer of patents at no cost.

   Other sources of information and data include papers, reports, books,
   and conference proceedings. Papers and books that are of special
   interest are those by Hans Coler (1946), the Gravity Research Group
   (GRG 1956), Stefan Marinov (1992), Hans Nieper (1984), and Shinichi
   Seike (1992). Conferences that have been recently held to collect and
   summarize information in these areas include the 26th and 27th
   Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conferences (1991 and 1992)
   and the more recent International Symposium on New Energy (ISNE)
   (April 1993). All of these materials are available from the sources
   identified in the references section. As a result of a 1993 ISNE
   working group, the working devices were categorized into four distinct
   areas: (1) Solid-State Space-Energy Generators, (2) Rotating
   Space-Energy Machines, (3) Fusion Conversion Devices, and (4) Hydrogen
   Energy.





Summary of Interesting Theories, Experiments, and Devices



   "Some things have to be believed to be seen." [1]

   There are several societies and conferences world-wide that present
   and sometimes document the results of research in these areas. As this
   work is not considered as mainstream science within the US, much of
   the results of these researchers goes by unnoticed. The 26th IECEC
   (1991) provided a forum for researchers in these areas to voluntarily
   come forward and present their ideas, theories, and results to the
   mainstream scientific community. They were met with interest ranging
   from mistrust to awe, and from feelings ranging from friendship to
   outright anger. The ranges of these attitudes will likely depend upon
   the emotional stability of the listeners.

   The 26th IECEC created international interest that stimulated further
   review papers to be published in the later IECECs. A growing group of
   organizations is networking on a world-wide basis to support and
   organize this on-going research. Some of these organizations are
   listed in the references (AREI, AFS, GRI, IASA, INE, ITS, JPI, SEA,
   TI, and USP). "New Energy News" is the new monthly newsletter of
   Institute for New Energy (INE), a recently formed US technical
   society, created in April 1993, that is committed to researching these
   technical areas. Note that the references include complete and
   accurate address and cost information, so that serious investigators
   have no excuse to not investigate.

   This review includes all of the information that was made available to
   the 1991 IECEC, the 1992 IECEC, the 1993 International Symposium on
   New Energy (ISNE), and other contributed personal source information
   and documents. Our focus here is on actual data and results - not on
   ideas or mathematical theories. Our emphasis here is on repeatable
   experimental evidence - or on the documented testimony of multiple
   reliable witnesses that have been willing to stand-up, testify, and
   document a description of what they witnessed.

   Just because you don't see it doesn't mean that it's not real!

   The list of the researchers, experiments, devices, and results that
   were addressed in this review are listed in Table 1. The reference
   corresponding to each researcher is also listed. Videotapes were made
   of all ref. speakers at the 1991 IECEC and the 1993 ISNE.





Possible Misleading Results



   "But goodness alone is never enough. A hard, cold wisdom is required
   for goodness to accomplish good." [2]

   We feel that the interpretation of anyone's results can fall into one
   of four categories: (1) Lying for attention; (2) Lying for money
   (funding, stock options, etc.); (3) Inaccurate measurement or
   misinterpretation of the data or results; and (4) Accurate
   representation of the physical phenomena. In our reviews, we found
   absolutely no evidence that any one of the researchers we studied in
   Table 1 belonged specifically in categories (1) or (2) (although so
   far as we know three of these researchers have not been able to
   replicate their initial published results). Frauds are quickly
   discovered, if encouraged to reproduce their results and to provide
   detailed information. So, we were left to carefully analyze the
   results from each researcher and to carefully draw our own
   conclusions.

   Table 1. A Listing of Researchers and their Experiments and/or Devices
   of Current Interest

Researcher(s)   Experiments, Devices, and Demonstrations        References

Adams, Robert   Adams Pulsed Motor Generator and Replication    Adams 1993

Baumann, Paul   Methernitha Swiss M-L Converter Device
et. al.         Demonstrations                                  IECEC 1991

Bedini, John    Bedini Free Energy Generator Plans and
                Demonstrations                                  IECEC 1991

Binder, Timothy Russell's Nuclear-Magnetic Transmutation        ISNE 1993
                Experiments

Brown, Paul     Nuclear Resonant Generators and Demonstrations  IECEC 1991

Coler, Hans     Magnetstromapparat and Stromerzeuger            Coler 1946
                Devices / Demos.

Grotz, Toby     Russell's Power Multiplication Principle        IECEC 1992,
                Experiments                                     ISNE 1993

Hathaway,       Unipolar Dynamo of Novel Construction           IECEC 1991,
George          Experiments                                     ISNE 1993

Hickox, Barbara Electric Dynamo Patent                          IECEC 1991

Johnson, Gary   Electrically Induced Explosions in              IECEC 1992
                Water Experiments

Kelly, Don      Electromagnetic Antigravity Drop Tests          ISNE 1993,
                                                                SEA

Lambertson,     WIN Process                                     IECEC 1991
Wingate

Marinov, Stefan Venetin Coliu Generator Demonstrations          ISNE 1993

McKie, Richard  Power On Demand Module Concept (PODMOD)         IECEC 1991

Meyer, Stanley  Water Fuel Cell Demonstrations                  ISNE 1993

Moray, John     T. Henry Moray's Radiant Energy Device          IECEC 1991
and Kevin

Muller, William Muller Motor/Generator                          IECEC 1991

Newman, Joseph  Magnetic Fields Utilization Energy Machine      Newman 1993

dePalma, Bruce  N-Machine Experiments                           IECEC 1991

Pappas, Panos   Energy Creation in Sparks and                   IECEC 1991
                Discharges Experiments

Reed, Troy      Reed Magnetic Motor Experiments                 IECEC 1991,
and Evelyn                                                      ISNE 1993

Seike, Shinichi Negative Energy and Landau Oscillator           Seike 1992
                Experiments

Storms, Edmund  Established Cold Fusion and Reproducible        IECEC 1993
                Results

Sweet, Floyd    Vacuum Triode Assembly Device Demonstrations    IECEC 1991

Tewari,         Space Power Generator Experiments               ISNE 1993
Paramahamsa

Valone, Thomas  Homopolar Generator Experiments                 IECEC 1991,
                                                                ISNE 1993



   While on one hand some researchers may possibly be overstating the
   capabilities and results of their experiments and devices, on the
   other hand many so-called 'scientific experts' are very active in
   discounting all of the research results in these areas without
   investigating the details of any of them. "The Nobel chemist Irving
   Langmuir (1881-1957) used to give a cautionary talk on pathological
   science, and ... told a number of stories of pathological science and
   listed the features they have in common." (Cromer, Skeptical Inquirer,
   1993). In his eight page article, Cromer states that there are many
   lessons from this: "(1) Scientists themselves are often poor judges of
   the scientific process; (2) Scientific research is very difficult.
   Anything that can go wrong will go wrong; (3) Science isn't dependent
   on the honesty or wisdom of scientists. (4) Real discoveries of
   phenomena contrary to all previous scientific experience are very
   rare, while fraud, fakery, foolishness, and error resulting from
   overenthusiasm and delusion are all too common. Thus, Glashow's
   closed-minded 'I don't believe a word of it' is going to be correct
   far more often than not." Cromer also cites Langmuir as saying
   (Langmuir 1989): "There are cases where there is no dishonesty
   involved, but where people are tricked into false results by a lack of
   understanding about what human beings can do to themselves in the way
   of being led astray by subjective effects, wishful thinking, or
   threshold interactions. These are examples of pathological science.
   These are things that attracted a great deal of attention. ... [But]
   the critics can't reproduce the effects. Only the supporters could do
   that. In the end, nothing was salvaged. Why should there be? There
   isn't anything there. There never was."

   Our sincere response to you is: If there is no initial interest - then
   there will be no investigation. If there is no investigation, there
   will be no research to replicate. Your interest will spark the urge to
   replicate. If there is interest, research, and no replication, then
   that fact should be published and disseminated with integrity. If
   there are witnesses to the results and the results were or are
   repeatable, then we feel the fault and blame lies with the critic and
   not with the researcher. Therefore, given the experiments and devices
   referenced in this paper: Demand that they be tested with an open
   mind! One success out of all of the failures is more than worth the
   effort!





Devices of Great Interest



   "Grant shook his head. It's been discussed, in the field. Many people
   imagined it was coming. But not so soon." "Story of our species,
   Malcolm said laughing. Everybody knows it's coming, but not so soon."
   [3]

   Table 2. A Listing of Promising Devices of Great Interest with
   Documented Demonstrations

Researcher(s)   Effects Observed         Yrs    Cat  Doc MWs RDs Res Eff

Baumann,        Over-Unity, Rotating,    1984+   2    Y   Y   Y   N   N
Paul et. al.    Self-Sustaining

Binder,         Chemical Dependency      1927+   1    Y   Y   Y   Y   N
Timothy         on E-M

Coler, Hans     Gravitational Field      1942+   1    Y   Y   Y   N   N
                Generator

Grotz, Toby     Over-Unity,              1961+   1    Y   Y   N   Y   N
                Rotational Generator

Kelly, Don      E-M Field Drop Tests     1992+   1    Y   N   Y   Y   N
                & Oscillators

Marinov,        Anti-Lenz Effect         1988+   1    Y   Y   Y   Y   N
Stefan          Motor/Generator

Meyer, Stanley  Energy from Water,       1980s   4    Y   Y   Y   Y   N
                H2 Fracturing

Moray, John     Over-Unity,              1930s   1    Y   Y   Y   N   N
and Kevin       Self-Sustaining Device

Storms, Edmund  Over-Unity Thermal,      1990s   3    Y   Y   Y   Y   N
                Cold Fusion

Sweet, Floyd    Over-Unity,              1990s   1    Y   Y   Y   N   N
                Steady-Variable Device

Tewari,         Over-Unity Rotational    1993    2    Y   N   Y   Y   N
Paramahamsa     N-Machine

Key:

Yrs     Years the Effects were observed.
Cat     Categories 1 through 4, as defined under 'Sources of Information
        and Data.'
Doc     Documentation Exists (Yes or No) (Y/N).
MWs     Multiple Witnesses Testimony (Y/N).
RDs     Repeated Demonstrations (Y/N).
Res     Currently Being Researched (Y/N).
Eff     Large Research Effort (Y/N).



   The researchers and the works that we feel are worthy of great
   attention in the near future are those that are listed in Table 2. It
   should be noted that some researchers have been omitted from Table 2
   only because either their work is of a proprietary or confidential
   nature, or because we could not obtain the required data or
   documentation from witnesses. Such researchers include: Paul Brown,
   Bruce dePalma, and the Reeds. All of the researchers listed in Table 1
   and not listed in Table 2 have provided and we trust will continue to
   provide important contributions to and documentation of their work. In
   fact, some of this work may be turn out to be more important than
   those currently listed in Table 2. However, at the present moment of
   time as this paper is being written, we considered those devices
   listed in Table 2 to be of the greatest interest to us.





Summary Information and Data



   The Methernitha Swiss M-L Converter developed by Paul Baumann and the
   Methernitha spiritual community in Switzerland has been repeatedly
   demonstrated to many scientists upon request (26th IECEC, Nieper 1984,
   SEA). Its three foot counter-rotating disks and specially designed
   energy storage system are reported to generate a steady output power
   of about 3 to 5 kilo-Watts (kW) indefinitely - while sitting on top of
   a table. A videotape has been produced and its narration has been
   transcribed.

   Tim Binder and his team have replicated the 1927 experiments of Walter
   Russell and have created fluorine from pure water vapor using complex
   E- M field arrangements. This work validates Russell's theories about
   nuclear structure and the proper arrangement of the Periodic Table of
   the Elements.

   Hans Coler demonstrated two major devices to many amazed witnesses and
   officials in Germany during 1925-1945. A 60 kW device was built in
   1937, and the war bombings ended further research in 1944. A complete
   32 page report declassified by the British Intelligence Objectives
   Sub- Committee is available. (Coler 1946, Nieper 1984) The theories
   expressed are very similar to those presented in a comprehensive
   report (GRG 1956) (the latest one we could find so far) on
   electrogravitics systems, interactions of E-M with gravity, or
   counterbary control devices.

   Toby Grotz and his team are planning to replicate the energy
   experiments of Walter Russell. In the fall of 1959, General Chapman,
   Colonel Fry, Major Sargent, Major Cripe, and others from NORAD in
   Colorado Springs, attended a meeting at Swannanoa, Virginia
   (University Of Science And Philosophy) at the invitation of Walter
   Russell. At this meeting Russell explained the workings of a device he
   proposed to build to take advantage of the vacuum state energy, and
   the two directional movement of energy from gravitation, (generation),
   to radiation, (degeneration). During the following year Russell, his
   wife, Lao, and their assistants built the device. The prototype that
   was built consisted of two sets of dual and magnetically-sexed coils.
   On September 10, 1961, Walter and Lao Russell reported to their
   contacts at NORAD, that the coils had worked and that the President of
   the United States could announce to the world that a "greater, safer
   power than atomic energy" could be provided for industry and
   transportation.

   Don Kelly is the editor of the Space Energy Newsletter (SEA) and has
   been conducting and reporting results of E-M to gravity drop tests. He
   finds that energized coil assemblies have a 40% lag in drop time over
   about five feet. Other related research world-wide verifies that
   spinning masses appear to lose weight at high rotational speeds.

   Stefan Marinov is the editor of Deutsche Physik in Germany and has
   demonstrated many experiments that confound conventional E-M theory.
   His recent paper describes devices that create anti-Lenz effects, thus
   increasing the generator's efficiency.

   Stanley Meyer has obtained over 28 patents in both the US and other
   countries that document his water fuel cell and hydrogen fracturing
   process technology. He began this work in 1980 and has spent over $1.6
   million. Although he has been approached to sell the technology, he
   says he has no intention to do so and plans to retain control to make
   sure his invention is brought to the public for the good of mankind.
   An informative and recommended videotape of his 1993 ISNE presentation
   is available through the INE.

   John and Kevin Moray are pursuing the technology that was repeatedly
   demonstrated to the press in the 1930s by T. Henry Moray. One device
   was reported to generate 50 kW for long periods of time by itself.

   Edmund Storms has reviewed much of the work done internationally in
   the so-called area of 'cold fusion' and has documented the results and
   repeated results of the now world-wide research in this area.

   Floyd Sweet demonstrated his vacuum triode device to at least two
   expert electronics technicians that have documented their observations
   in sworn affidavits. A videotape was also made during a demonstration.
   From a nine volt battery starter unit, nearly continuous output powers
   of 500 W to 50 kW have been reported to be observed. Experimentation
   is still in progress to further refine the device and to improve its
   operational capabilities.

   Paramahamsa Tewari has been doing experiments with a N-Machine and has
   reported over-unity operation from instrument readings. He is
   currently performing new experiments to feed the output of the device
   back into the input to obtain a 'free-running' condition. Many
   researchers have performed experiments with these devices, also
   called, homo-polar generators, or unipolar dynamos. They usually
   consist of a rotating magnetic disk where electrical current is passed
   from the center of the disk to its edge. Small increases in the motor
   input power result in large increases of output power, thus
   encouraging the idea of an over- unity cross-over point. Regardless of
   all of the theory and reasons pro and con, it will be exciting to see
   the results of Tewari's forthcoming experiments and videotapes.

   It appears that all serious research and development activities in the
   energy conversion technologies will continue to be closely monitored
   and guarded by the existing oil, transportation, and economics
   industries. Serious researchers in these new areas (Meyer,
   Methernitha, Sweet) are not allowing "the establishment" to buy them
   out. At the same time, there is strong evidence of aggressive
   suppression. The German company Becocraft specializing in the
   development of "new energy devices" was forcibly shut down and its
   president quickly imprisoned on investment fraud charges in a court
   case that had only one plaintiff: the Utility Company of Cologne!
   (Marinov 1992). All of the investors of Becocraft fought the case to
   no avail. Closer to home, the US Patent Office has classified over
   3,000 patent devices or applications under the secrecy order, Title
   35, U.S. Code (1952) Sections 181-188. Where did that technology go?
   These patents would be a great place to start for a new company
   involved with defense conversion technologies for environmental use!





Conclusions



   "Woe to you, you blind leaders of a hoard of blind, who say: 'This
   should be done and that should not be left undone.' You only represent
   a false teaching and ignore the laws of Creation." [4]

   "It has been said that science is man's futile attempt to understand
   Nature. While it becomes important to learn, understand, and apply
   science in our everyday lives, it is equally important to continue the
   pursuit of unraveling the secrets of Nature." (ISNE 1993, from Forward
   1).

   If ignorance was a good enough reason to not try, the light bulb would
   have never been invented and the Earth would still be flat. Let us be
   judged by our work and repeatable results, and not by hasty words. If
   some of these works turn out to be not valid: So Be It; Let it Be
   Known; and Let's Move Forward with Integrity! We are all desperately
   looking for the next big breakthrough in modern physics to assist us
   in solving the escalating energy and environment crises! Do something
   to promote and encourage the continuation of these researchers and
   these works! If you don't do it, who will? If not now, when?



   References [5]

   26th IECEC, Proceedings of the 26th IECEC, Volume 4, pp 329-492,
   August 1991: American Nuclear Society, 555 North Kensington Avenue, La
   Grange Park, IL 60525, $275.00.

   27th IECEC, Proceedings of the 27th IECEC, Volume, pp 4.357-4.295,
   August 1992: Society of Automotive Engineers, 400 Commonwealth Drive,
   Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Order No. P-259, $350.00.

   28th IECEC, Proceedings of the 28th IECEC, August 1993: American
   Chemical Society, Meetings Department, 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W.,
   Washington D.C. 20036, $310.00.

   Adams, R. "The Adams Pulsed Motor Generator Manual," Jan. 1993: Nexus
   New Times Magazine, PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560, Australia, $50.00.

   AERI, Advanced Energy Research Institute, 14 Devonshire Mews West,
   London W1N 1FP, Great Britain.

   AFS, Academy for Future Sciences, PO Box FE, Los Gatos, CA 95031.

   Coler, H., "The Invention of Hans Coler, Relating to an Alleged New
   Source of Power," British Intelligence Objectives Sub-Committee report
   No. 1043 Item 31, 32 pp, Now Unclassified, Summer 1946. (Available
   from the authors for $5.00)

   Cromer, A., "Pathological Science: An Update," Skeptical Inquirer,
   Vol. 17, pp 400-407, 1993.

   Figgie, H. E. Jr., Bankruptcy 1995: The Coming Collapse of America and
   How to Stop It, Little, Brown and Company, US and Canada, 1992.

   GRG, Gravity Research Group, "Electrogravitics Systems: An Examination
   of Electrostatic Motion, Dynamic Counterbary, and Barycentric
   Control," Feb. 1956: Gravity Research Group report GRG-013/56, Wright
   Patterson AFB Technical Library, Catalog No. TL 565 A9, WPAFB, Ohio
   45433.

   GRI, Group Research Institute, PO Box 438, Nelson, New Zealand.

   IASA, Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin, 4030 Braker Lane W.,
   Suite 300, Austin, TX 78759.

   INE, Institute for New Energy, 1304 South College Avenue, Fort
   Collins, CO 80524, $40.00/yr.

   ITS, International Tesla Society, PO Box 5636, Colorado Springs, CO
   80931.

   ISNE, Proceedings of the International Symposium on New Energy, April
   16-18, 1993: International Association for New Science (IANS), 1304
   South College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80524,[phone], $45.00
   for both the IANS and INE. IANS supports the INE.

   JPI, Japan Psychrotronic Institute, c/o Shiuji Inomata,
   Electrotechnical Laboratory, 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki 305,
   Japan. Langmuir, I., "Pathological Science," Physics Today, 42: 36-48,
   October 1989.

   Marinov, S., "Regarding Becocraft - Letter to Mr. Richard von
   Weizsacker, President of the German Federal Republic, 10 October 1992"
   , Deutsche Physik, No. 7, East-West Publishers, Morellenfeldgasse 16,
   A- 8010 Graz, Austria.

   Meyer, S. Water Fuel Cell Technical Brief, July 1991: Stanley A.
   Meyer, 3792 Grove City, OH 43123, $25.00.

   "New Energy News", PO Box 58639, Salt Lake City, UT 84158-8639:
   monthly newsletter free to INE members.

   Newman, J., The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman, July 1993: Joseph
   Westley Newman, Route 1, Box 52, Lucedale, Miss. 39452, $60.00.

   Nieper, H. A., Revolution in Technology, Medicine and Society, MIT
   Verlag, Germany, 1984 (In English): Tesla Book Company, PO Box 121873,
   Chula Vista, CA 91912, $27.00.

   SEA, Space Energy Association, PO Box 11422, Clearwater, FL 34616.

   Seike, S., The Principles of Ultra Relativity, 11th Ed., 1992: Space
   Research Institute, Box 33, Uwajima, Ehime (798), Japan, $70.00.

   Storms, E., "The Status of 'Cold Fusion'," 28th IECEC paper, August
   1993.

   TI, Tesla Incorporated, 820 Bridger Circle, Craig, CO 81625.

   USP, Univ. of Science and Philosophy, Swannanoa Place, Box 520,
   Waynesboro, VA 22980.





Acknowledgments



   The authors gratefully acknowledge these and many other researchers,
   scientists, and skeptics that have contributed serious open research
   and documentation to boldly advance science and technology for the
   benefit of the human race.



Footnotes



    1. Poltergeist, Screenplay to the MGM/UA film production and VHS
       videotape, 1987.
    2. Heinlein, Robert A., Stranger in a Strange Land, Berkley Books,
       1982.
    3. Crichton, Michael, Jurassic Park, Ballantine Books, 1990.
    4. Rashid, Isa; Meier, Eduard. The Talmud of Jmmanuel, 24:29-30,
       1990: Wild Flower Press, PO Box 230893, Tigard, Oregon, 97224,
       $17.20.
    5. Complete addresses and total prices are given.




     _________________________________________________________________

   This Paper Was Presented and Published at the: 28th Intersociety
   Energy Conversion Engineering Conference August 8-13, 1993, in
   Atlanta, GA. Proceedings Pages 2.905-2.910.

   The Proceedings of the Conference are Available: ISBN 0-8412-2772-5
   [See "28th IECEC" in the References]

   The paper was also recently published in the New Energy News, Vol. 1,
   No. 6, October 1993. [See "INE" and "IANS" in the References]


     _________________________________________________________________

   Converted by [e-mail]

    [IMAGE]